"All mankind is from Adam and Eve, white has no superiority over black nor a black has any superiority over white except by piety and good action. Learn that everyone of us constitute one brotherhood.Do not, therefore, do injustice to yourselves."
Saturday, 5 February 2011
The man who isn’t there
You might say that Liu Bolin likes to blend in.
But the Chinese artist does more than just wear camouflage pants and stand next to a bush. With the help of some assistants, Bolin paints himself, head to toe and unassumingly just stands there--in grocery stores, next to piles of coal, on staircases, you name it. And, unless you look really closely, you'll miss him entirely--which is pretty much the point.
It turns out that the process of making oneself truly invisible is quite painstaking. According to a report in the U.K.'s Daily Mail, Bolin spends hours perfecting his poses to ensure that he'll mesh with his background. Bolin then stands "in front of backdrops with a team of two assistants to paint the camouflage on his clothes." The "camouflage" can be anything, so long as Bolin segues seamlessly into the backdrop.
Aside from looking cool, Bolin's work does have a deeper meaning. Again according to the Daily Mail, the living sculptures are "designed to show how we all can just disappear in today's mass production world." And how! The photo of Bolin standing in front of a grocery store shelf full of soda cans and bottles is full of color, shading and shadow.
Bolin, who has been at this for several years, has built up an impressive portfolio. A gallery of his work can been seen at Eli Klein Fine Art.
Thursday, 3 February 2011
Kepler has spotted five planets about the size of Earth, orbiting stars in our galaxy.
(CNN) -- Are we alone in the universe? Findings by NASA's Kepler space telescope are making that seem less likely.
NASA scientists have announced Kepler has spotted five planets about the size of Earth, orbiting stars in our galaxy.
These planets are orbiting in what is known as the habitable zone, which puts them at a distance from their suns where liquid water could exist. Liquid water is a key ingredient for life to form.
"In a generation we have gone from extraterrestrial planets being a mainstay of science fiction, to the present, where Kepler has helped turn science fiction into today's reality," said NASA Administrator Charles Bolden.
The Kepler science team also announced the telescope found six planets, all larger than Earth, orbiting a single sun-like star.
NASA finds six planets orbiting star RELATED TOPICS
NASA
Charles Bolden
Milky Way Galaxy
That star is some 2,000 light years from Earth.
To date, the telescope has detected more than 1,200 planet candidates. The fact that so many planets have been found in the Milky Way galaxy "suggests there are countless planets orbiting sun-like stars in our galaxy," said William Borucki, Kepler's principal investigator.
Kepler does not actually see the planets themselves. The telescope sees tiny decreases in light from the stars as planets transit across their suns.
The five Earth-sized planets are orbiting stars cooler and smaller than our sun, and further analysis is still necessary to officially confirm they are planets.
Tuesday, 1 February 2011
Deforestation In Malaysia
AMSTERDAM - NEW satellite imagery shows Malaysia is destroying forests more than three times faster than all of Asia combined, and its carbon-rich peat soils of the Sarawak coast are being stripped even faster, according to a study released on Tuesday.
The report commissioned by the Netherlands-based Wetlands International says Malaysia is uprooting an average 2 per cent of the rain forest a year on Sarawak, its largest state on the island of Borneo, or nearly 10 per cent over the last five years. Most of it is being converted to palm oil plantations, it said.
The deforestation rate for all of Asia during the same period was 2.8 per cent, it said.
In the last five years, 353,000 hectares of Malaysia's peatlands were deforested, or one-third of the swamps which have stored carbon from decomposed plants for millions of years.
Malaysia and Indonesia produce about 85 per cent of the world's palm oil, an ingredient in cooking oil, cosmetics, soaps, bread, and chocolate.
It also is used as an industrial lubricant and was once considered an ideal biofuel alternative to fossil fuel, but it has fallen out of favour because of earlier reports of widespread rainforest destruction for the expansion of plantations. -- AP
Monday, 31 January 2011
World's Largest Solar Boat
A German-built solar powered boat embarked on a 31,000 mile round-the-world voyage this past Monday from Monaco — making it the largest such “solar vessel” ever to attempt the feat.
The boat, built in just 14 months, is covered with over 5,780 square feet of 18.8 percent-efficiency photovoltaic cells, with a capable output of 93.5kW of power.
“The aim is to offer future-proof solutions for sustainable living in major cities and environmentally responsible mobility concepts,” said the boat’s owner, German eco-investor Immo Stroher. “Solar mobility can make a significant contribution to this endeavor.”
You can follow the ship’s progress by visiting the Planet Solar website here.
Sunday, 23 January 2011
What If Monaco Floated ?
A British company has come up with a design for what might be the most expensive private luxury yacht, one that would approach $1.1 billion to build and tens of millions to operate each year. If it doesn't capture that title, though, it will no doubt lay claim to another honor—that of ugliest, gaudiest, and most over-the-top vessel to set sail.
Meet the Streets of Monaco, which resembles an aircraft carrier more than it does a traditional yacht. The company designing it, Yacht Island Design in Derbyshire, released concept images of the ship, which show it recreating key landmarks of the principality on the Mediterranean Sea.
According to the Daily Mail, which recently ran a story about the yacht:
The 500-foot-long boat—expected to cost up to £700million—also boasts miniatures of the famed Monte Carlo Casino, Hotel de Paris, Cafe de Paris, La Rascasse, the Loews Hotel as well as swimming pools and tennis courts.
The most mind-bending feature is the Monaco Grand Prix-inspired go-kart track complete with tunnel complex which runs around the deck.
For all this, you might expect the ship to be able to carry hundreds of passengers. But it's only designed for 16 guests and a staff of 70.
Saturday, 22 January 2011
Prehistoric DNA to Help Solve Human-Evolution Mysteries?
It may be possible to extract DNA from the bones of human ancestors and other hominids who died up to one million years ago, researchers believe. Hominids are primates that walk upright, including humans and extinct human ancestors and related forms.
Experts speaking at a chemistry conference held in Chicago earlier this month argued that ancient genetic material could be used to better understand the relationships among hominids and answer questions about the evolution of speech and other defining traits of humans.
"DNA is a relatively weak molecule, comparatively speaking, yet under certain conditions it persists in the fossil record despite what chemistry [in the lab] predicts," said Hendrik Poinar, a molecular anthropologist at McMaster University in Ontario Canada. Fragments of genetic material may survive much longer in fossils than laboratory experiments have so far predicted, he said.
Revolution in Evolution Studies
The study of ancient human evolution is one of science's most contentious disciplines. Anthropologists are frequently locked in debate on issues ranging from migration to classification of hominid species. However, new molecular techniques may now revolutionize the field, as well as the study of ancient plants and other animals.
DNA extracted from specimens of extinct animals has already been used to show that the Mauritian dodo is a close cousin to the common pigeon. It has also proven that widely varying bones left behind by New Zealand's giant moa birds belong to the massive females and much-smaller males of a single species. Previous analysis of bones alone had led researchers to mistakenly classify the un-sexed remains into a large number of different species.
The key to finding ancient DNA lies in the conditions of preservation, Poinar said. Researchers already know that DNA is relatively easy to extract from tens-of-thousands-of-years-old mammoths buried in Siberian permafrost. But desert caves with constant temperatures and very low levels of humidity can also be surprisingly good at preservation, he said.
In contrast, horse bones left in the open in a moist temperate country such as Germany might be completely stripped of genetic material in less than 50 years.
Laboratory experiments that estimate the rate of degradation of DNA in bone have predicted that large fragments of the molecule are unable to survive longer than 10,000 years in temperate regions, Poinar said. But researchers have already managed to find DNA sequences that have survived much longer.
Poinar led the team that last year extracted DNA from 30,000-year-old fossilized ground sloth dung. That DNA had persisted against all odds in a warm Nevada desert cave and was four times as old as the theoretical age limit predicted for DNA survival at that temperature.
Protein attached to bone can also hold genetic data (protein sequences mirror those of the DNA they are modeled on), and these more robust molecules may persist even longer in the fossil record.
British researchers revealed in 2002 that they had extracted the world's first intact protein sequence from 60,000-year-old frozen bison bones. As yet unpublished findings may soon reveal protein sequences from horses many times older, Poinar said.
Oldest DNA
The oldest DNA ever found comes from Siberian dirt analyzed by bioarchaeologist Eske Willerslev at Oxford University in England. Willerslev, who also spoke at PITTCON, the Chicago chemistry conference, has found fragments of DNA from plants, fungi, and animals in 350,000-year-old permafrost soil cores.
But Poinar believes that, under exceptional circumstances, researchers might be able to get small fragments of DNA in human and animal bones that are up to a million years old, and protein sequences from even earlier.
Hominid DNA could then be used to piece together the much-disputed relationships of our extinct relatives.
"Sadly there's not much hope for many of the African fossils," Poinar said, pointing to the fact that most hominids are known from hot climates where DNA degrades rapidly. Cool cave sites at high elevations would be the best bet, he said.
Poinar's work centers on the analysis of coprolites: fossilized human and animal dung. Analyzing DNA from fossilized Cro-Magnon human and Neandertal feces might provide answers to questions about early human evolution, particularly the evolution of language. Poinar hopes to acquire fossil coprolites from the caves of Mount Carmel near Haifa in Israel.
Geneticists have shown that a gene called FOXP2 may be required for the fine-tuning of speech. Studies suggest that this gene may have evolved in its present version around 50,000 years ago, Poinar said.
DNA in these fossils from Israel might therefore confirm whether the modern version of the gene had evolved by that time and might hint at whether Neandertals—the last of whom died out 40,000 years ago—had the ability to speak or not.
"In theory it might be possible to extract hominid DNA from [very old] fossil bones," commented Matthew Collins, director of York University's Bioarcheology Center in England. Collins is also a speaker at the Chicago conference and part of the team that extracted protein from the 60,000-year-old bison bone.
But proteins are much more durable, Collins said. Tightly bound to bone, and permanently frozen, they might last for an astounding 100 million years. Though a very long shot, he said, it is theoretically possible that even dinosaur fossils (the youngest of which are 60 million years old) could harbor some genetic information
Civilization's Future
Number's
Energy fills our bodies and powers our machines. When the energy supply has no bounds, we can do what we want with near impunity. An exact accounting would sum muscular effort and engine activity. We can use expenditures as a comparative corollary. Consider the following, all in billions of 2010 US dollars;
Supply World GDP $58140
Entertainment Macau casinos $33
Movie production $1.1
Spiritual Catholic church annual income $0.115
Infrastructure Canada power generation $20
Canada transportation $17
China rail $40
Knowledge Wikipedia $0.016
Expansion NASA $18.7
Debt Global $38695
It is difficult to see the future based upon these expenditures. Where is the focus of energy expenditure? Also, for how long will we manage to support that (energy) debt?
Blue Fin Shushi
Food is the energy source that powers the human body. On average a person needs 10MJ a day. Multiply that by 365 days a year and the nearly 7 billion hungry people and that’s a huge amount of energy.
Consider the recent auction of a blue-fin tuna. One fish sold for $396000US. That’s 342 kilograms going likely for a lot of sushi meals. For another indicator, the United Nations food price index is at an all time high. This quantifies the higher cost for the same meal world-wide.
How do we balance our hunger, our reliance upon natural food stocks and the diminishing quantity of these resources? Our population increases inexorably while the available, edible energy supplies decrease. What does this say about the future of our civilization?.
Where To Go ?
Planning for the future is a hallmark of humankind. Few if any other animals can project trends into the future. With this, people can plan over decades to build an orbiting space station. With this, we can also identify activity prejudicial to our future well being and perhaps do something about it.
Given an ever decreasing ready access to primary energy sources (coal, oil and natural gas), we’re now considering replacements via natural processes. Options focus upon solar power, whether directly onto silicon cells or indirectly through vegetation and into ethanol.
Wanting to use great amounts of energy far into the future means having access to primary and solar energy sources. A measure of availability of energy is the human population over solar receptors, that is over arable land. Many city states have densities well above 100 people per hectare. Moving there wouldn’t be a good idea. Australia and Canada lie at the opposite end both with less than one person per hectare. Perhaps this is why both these countries maintain high immigration levels. But, the population density increases in these countries, and the energy availability per person decreases. Will these countries still be a favoured destination far into the future or will other factors come into play?.
Coal Fire
Planning for the future is a hallmark of humankind. Few if any other animals can project trends into the future. With this, people can plan over decades to build an orbiting space station. With this, we can also identify activity prejudicial to our future well being and perhaps do something about it.
Given an ever decreasing ready access to primary energy sources (coal, oil and natural gas), we’re now considering replacements via natural processes. Options focus upon solar power, whether directly onto silicon cells or indirectly through vegetation and into ethanol.
Wanting to use great amounts of energy far into the future means having access to primary and solar energy sources. A measure of availability of energy is the human population over solar receptors, that is over arable land. Many city states have densities well above 100 people per hectare. Moving there wouldn’t be a good idea. Australia and Canada lie at the opposite end both with less than one person per hectare. Perhaps this is why both these countries maintain high immigration levels. But, the population density increases in these countries, and the energy availability per person decreases. Will these countries still be a favoured destination far into the future or will other factors come into play?.
The United Kingdom
The United Kingdom is mostly one island. Becasue of this, the people within its shores effectively tabulate the amount of ingress and egress of material. For the last 40 years the North Sea oil fields have enabled the United Kingdom to be nearly energy independent. Now though, the extraction of oil from the fields has peaked and they recover less and less oil over time. This has made the island state again dependent upon foreign nations for its energy needs.
As the oil fields were developed and energy swelled the nation’s coffers, the United Kingdom followed an aggressive foreign posture. They could send a strong naval force almost anywhere in the world. They designed and built their own defence weaponry. As well, they expected their voice to be heard and their requests considered at international forums.
Without a source of abundant energy, the United Kingdom must follow another path. For one, they have taken a step on the road of austerity. They’ve greatly lowered their military budget. Their research and development will likely decrease as more funds are used to maintain infrastructure and purchase off-shore energy. Will another consequence be a decreaes in their international image? Will they become more insular and reflective? Will the loss of readily available energy make humanity less of a global village and more a collection of small, self-centered states? If so, how will we ever continue improving upon our civilization?.
Energy Bulletin
Energy fills our bodies and powers our machines. When the energy supply has no bounds, we can do what we want with near impunity. An exact accounting would sum muscular effort and engine activity. We can use expenditures as a comparative corollary. Consider the following, all in billions of 2010 US dollars;
Supply World GDP $58140
Entertainment Macau casinos $33
Movie production $1.1
Spiritual Catholic church annual income $0.115
Infrastructure Canada power generation $20
Canada transportation $17
China rail $40
Knowledge Wikipedia $0.016
Expansion NASA $18.7
Debt Global $38695
It is difficult to see the future based upon these expenditures. Where is the focus of energy expenditure? Also, for how long will we manage to support that (energy) debt?
Blue Fin Shushi
Food is the energy source that powers the human body. On average a person needs 10MJ a day. Multiply that by 365 days a year and the nearly 7 billion hungry people and that’s a huge amount of energy.
Consider the recent auction of a blue-fin tuna. One fish sold for $396000US. That’s 342 kilograms going likely for a lot of sushi meals. For another indicator, the United Nations food price index is at an all time high. This quantifies the higher cost for the same meal world-wide.
How do we balance our hunger, our reliance upon natural food stocks and the diminishing quantity of these resources? Our population increases inexorably while the available, edible energy supplies decrease. What does this say about the future of our civilization?.
Where To Go ?
Planning for the future is a hallmark of humankind. Few if any other animals can project trends into the future. With this, people can plan over decades to build an orbiting space station. With this, we can also identify activity prejudicial to our future well being and perhaps do something about it.
Given an ever decreasing ready access to primary energy sources (coal, oil and natural gas), we’re now considering replacements via natural processes. Options focus upon solar power, whether directly onto silicon cells or indirectly through vegetation and into ethanol.
Wanting to use great amounts of energy far into the future means having access to primary and solar energy sources. A measure of availability of energy is the human population over solar receptors, that is over arable land. Many city states have densities well above 100 people per hectare. Moving there wouldn’t be a good idea. Australia and Canada lie at the opposite end both with less than one person per hectare. Perhaps this is why both these countries maintain high immigration levels. But, the population density increases in these countries, and the energy availability per person decreases. Will these countries still be a favoured destination far into the future or will other factors come into play?.
Coal Fire
Planning for the future is a hallmark of humankind. Few if any other animals can project trends into the future. With this, people can plan over decades to build an orbiting space station. With this, we can also identify activity prejudicial to our future well being and perhaps do something about it.
Given an ever decreasing ready access to primary energy sources (coal, oil and natural gas), we’re now considering replacements via natural processes. Options focus upon solar power, whether directly onto silicon cells or indirectly through vegetation and into ethanol.
Wanting to use great amounts of energy far into the future means having access to primary and solar energy sources. A measure of availability of energy is the human population over solar receptors, that is over arable land. Many city states have densities well above 100 people per hectare. Moving there wouldn’t be a good idea. Australia and Canada lie at the opposite end both with less than one person per hectare. Perhaps this is why both these countries maintain high immigration levels. But, the population density increases in these countries, and the energy availability per person decreases. Will these countries still be a favoured destination far into the future or will other factors come into play?.
The United Kingdom
The United Kingdom is mostly one island. Becasue of this, the people within its shores effectively tabulate the amount of ingress and egress of material. For the last 40 years the North Sea oil fields have enabled the United Kingdom to be nearly energy independent. Now though, the extraction of oil from the fields has peaked and they recover less and less oil over time. This has made the island state again dependent upon foreign nations for its energy needs.
As the oil fields were developed and energy swelled the nation’s coffers, the United Kingdom followed an aggressive foreign posture. They could send a strong naval force almost anywhere in the world. They designed and built their own defence weaponry. As well, they expected their voice to be heard and their requests considered at international forums.
Without a source of abundant energy, the United Kingdom must follow another path. For one, they have taken a step on the road of austerity. They’ve greatly lowered their military budget. Their research and development will likely decrease as more funds are used to maintain infrastructure and purchase off-shore energy. Will another consequence be a decreaes in their international image? Will they become more insular and reflective? Will the loss of readily available energy make humanity less of a global village and more a collection of small, self-centered states? If so, how will we ever continue improving upon our civilization?.
Energy Bulletin
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















